<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hundred Dollar Laptop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metrocat.org/2005/11/hundred-dollar-laptop/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metrocat.org/2005/11/hundred-dollar-laptop</link>
	<description>You're reading the bite-sized musings on travel, technology, and other miscellaneous topics by Anna and Jeff Watkins from Los Gatos, a small town nestled in the hills at the southern end of Silicon Valley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:05:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cbd</title>
		<link>http://metrocat.org/2005/11/hundred-dollar-laptop#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>cbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The central objection about computer technology here and in Steward&#039;s article---that the machine will replace the human---has been raised about all kinds of technologies, from writing to VCRs to televisions. But technology never displaces humanity; instead it changes it---indeed, we see book and handwriting technologies now as warm, fuzzy, genuine, etc. Years ago, they were threatening.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me, the one-size-fits-all, testing-driven curricula, forced on us by No Child Left Behind and similar initiatives, is a far greater threat than Linux laptops. &lt;em&gt;That&lt;/em&gt; is where the McDonalds-ization of schooling is coming from. And I see the lack of prescribed content as the way to counter it: without a default, locally developed and/or localized curricula are the only way to go. Teachers and students who create and deliver aren&#039;t merely filling in scantrons to the tune of &quot;learning objectives&quot; or &quot;outcomes.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though I&#039;m sure &lt;a href=&quot;http://ocw.mit.edu/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MIT can suggest where to go&lt;/a&gt; for content...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Last week I entered a similar comment on the old Newburyportion, which apparently was hungry, and ate it. I hope this one isn&#039;t as tasty.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The central objection about computer technology here and in Steward&#8217;s article&#8212;that the machine will replace the human&#8212;has been raised about all kinds of technologies, from writing to VCRs to televisions. But technology never displaces humanity; instead it changes it&#8212;indeed, we see book and handwriting technologies now as warm, fuzzy, genuine, etc. Years ago, they were threatening.</p>

<p>For me, the one-size-fits-all, testing-driven curricula, forced on us by No Child Left Behind and similar initiatives, is a far greater threat than Linux laptops. <em>That</em> is where the McDonalds-ization of schooling is coming from. And I see the lack of prescribed content as the way to counter it: without a default, locally developed and/or localized curricula are the only way to go. Teachers and students who create and deliver aren&#8217;t merely filling in scantrons to the tune of &#8220;learning objectives&#8221; or &#8220;outcomes.&#8221;</p>

<p>Though I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/" rel="nofollow">MIT can suggest where to go</a> for content&#8230;</p>

<p>(Last week I entered a similar comment on the old Newburyportion, which apparently was hungry, and ate it. I hope this one isn&#8217;t as tasty.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
