31 January, 2004
Politics
Once again, Josh Marshall has hit the nail on the head in his latest posting regarding the WMD scandal. David Kay
seems to think the CIA owes Bush an apology; but what really
does Kay know?
What we have here is a serious intelligence failure, but one
that in itself would almost certainly not have led to war, at least
not on the grounds of there being an imminent threat to the United
States. Recognizing that it was an insufficient casus belli the
White House then hyped it up with all manner of unsubstantiated
mumbo-jumbo.
And for this the Intelligence Community owes the president an
apology?
Just as the president did last summer when he forced an apology
from George Tenet over the Niger-uranium claims and then tried to
put the matter to rest without firing Tenet or asking for any kind
of investigation, he now wants to pocket the blame being heaped on
the Agency (because it absolves him politically) without having any
sort of investigation to get to the heart of what happened.
Why? Simple. Because any truly independent investigation of how
this all unfolded would expose the administration’s systematic
exaggeration of what we knew about the threat Iraq posed and,
almost certainly, its willful deception of the American people.
I hope Bush isn’t able to block an independent investigation. I’m
certain that he’ll try; but let’s hope he fails. It is
imperative that we understand why we went to war against Iraq,
especially as we will be an occupying power there for many years to
come.
30 January, 2004
Politics
Josh Marshall asks the following really excellent question on his
weblog, Talking Points
Memo:
Should an advisor to the Pentagon be pocketing a fee for helping
to raise money for a terrorist organization?
The issue seems to be that everyone’s favourite hawk, Richard Perle,
was paid to give a speech to a group that the state department
considers to be a terrorist organisation. Perle is the same guy who’s
been beating the drums about going to war with Iran and the rest of the
Axis of Evil.
You should really read both
the first entry discussing the Perle matter and the
follow up entry.
Marshall provides really excellent commentary on the media’s
coverage of politics. He’s a little left of center; but definitely not
– as my father likes to say — a “liberal mouthpiece”.
As many of you are probably already too aware, for the past four
months I have been working as a temp for a local financial services
company. In fact, yesterday I celebrated the fact that I had been
working for exactly four months continuously- almost a new
personal record (since I returned from California).
Alas, it would appear that today is my last.
I have been quite fortunate- most temps don’t last more than a
month. I have met a number of really sweet people who I would consider
my friends. I have also had the opportunity to exercise and strengthen
some of my flabby office skills, and gained the confidence to try new
roles I had not even though of previously.
But damn, I am not happy about my impending departure!
As my good buddy, Hamlet, once said:
Who would [9-5] bear, to grunt and sweat under a weary life,
but that the dread of something after [employment],
the undiscovered country from whose bourn no [worker] returns,
puzzles the will, and makes us rather bear [that job] we have,
then fly to others we know not of?
Perhaps I’m being overly dramatic about this.
No, not me.